- What’s so special about Itaewon?
- The rise in the popularity of Halloween in Korea
- So what happened and why? We still don’t know exactly…
- Could the Itaewon tragedy have been avoided?
- “We understand that it was not a problem that could have been solved by deploying police or firefighters in advance” ~ Lee Sang-min, Minister of the Interior and Safety
- Was there an overreaction to the Itaewon tragedy?
- What do I hope will happen as a result of the Itaewon tragedy?
- Who’s to blame for the Itaewon tragedy?
- We can take more responsibility for our own safety
- Sadly, the Itaewon tragedy highlights a larger problem—lax safety standards
- A general awareness of how dangerous cars can be seems to be lacking
- A lack of situational awareness may be partially responsible for the Itaewon tragedy
- Let’s never forget the Itaewon tragedy, but let’s learn from it so nothing like this ever happens again
- Awareness and education are key to preventing another Itaewon tragedy
I’ll never forget Saturday, October 29, 2022. It was the 31st anniversary of my mother’s passing and my niece’s wedding day. It was also the date of the Itaewon tragedy that saw 150+ people killed in a crowd crush.
Neither myself nor my family was anywhere near Itaewon that night. I haven’t heard of any friends hurt or affected by the tragedy. I learned a friend’s 19-year-old daughter was in Itaewon that night—but she was unharmed.
This week’s blog diverges from my usual posts on grammar, copywriting and personal updates. Though outside my area of expertise, I wanted to express my thoughts.
Disclaimer: I wrote this post between October 30 and November 7. It may not reflect the most recent updates on the investigation.
What’s so special about Itaewon?
For those not familiar with Itaewon, it is a neighborhood in Seoul. It has traditionally been very popular among the foreign residents of Seoul. Itaewon sprung up due to its proximity to the Yongsan American army base (now relocated to Pyeongtaek). It was a place for US soldiers to let loose. It boasts Western-style bars, restaurants, and other “amenities” often found near army bases. People often refer to one end of Itaewon as Hooker Hill.
I am by no means an expert on Itaewon. Years ago, while playing on a Sunday league team, I frequented Itaewon bars on weekends with my teammates. We often went to the bar that sponsored our team after our Sunday games. However, I haven’t been there in years. In my experience, Itaewon used to be a very seedy area. But in recent years, it’s become more upscale. International restaurants and trendy clubs have replaced the dive bars it was once famous for.
The rise in the popularity of Halloween in Korea
Itaewon was once the hangout of choice for expats. Recently, it has become more popular with young Koreans. Koreans in their 20s have been going to Itaewon in greater numbers for several years. This is also true for Halloween.
Years ago, in Korea, only children at English academies and expats celebrated Halloween. The holiday has never involved the trick-or-treating associated with it in the West. The costume aspect of Halloween seems to appeal more and more to young Korean adults. Expats normalized dressing up for Halloween in Itaewon—it became the go-to place.
During Halloween 2020, before COVID-19 exploded in Korea, there were criticisms of the crowds celebrating Halloween in Itaewon. Last year, near the beginning of the “return to normal,” Halloween was, by all accounts, a quiet affair. Authorities threatened stiff penalties for breaching COVID-19 social distancing rules. There were accusations that targeting Halloween celebrations was xenophobic. Authorities tried to downplay those claims.
This year was the first time in a long time people could go out and celebrate Halloween unrestricted. We don’t require masks outdoors in Korea, though you still need them indoors. By all accounts, authorities expected to see bigger crowds than usual this year. Initial reports claim there were fewer than 200 police officers in Itaewon this year. I haven’t found numbers for how many police were deployed to Itaewon on Halloween in previous years. But I have read that the crowds this year weren’t larger than in the past.
So what happened and why? We still don’t know exactly…
Itaewon consists of one large main street and several small alleyways that branch off. The incident occurred in one of these alleyways on a short but somewhat steep hill. Over the past weeks, details have emerged, painting a picture of what happened. Please refer to this Reuters article for a better understanding of what happened. It includes infographics and animations that explain how things occurred.
Most of Itaewon was crowded, but that alleyway became extremely packed. People struggled to move and may have already had trouble breathing. Reports indicated that somewhere in the middle of this alleyway, some people fell. The crowd behind filled in this space, causing people to either trample those who had fallen or pile on top of them.
There are several reports of people in the midst of this calling 119 (the Korean equivalent of 911). They reported being unable to breathe and were pleading for help. Despite the deployment of 800+ first responders and several ambulances, 150+ people died. More than 170 were injured—several critically.
Could the Itaewon tragedy have been avoided?
Initially, I thought this was a freak accident. It was a tragic but unfortunate accident that was difficult to prevent. That was before the government claimed it was difficult to prevent because it was an unorganized event. As more information came out, I changed my mind.
Crowd crush tragedies most often occur at organized events. Crowd crushes are not uncommon at music concerts (i.e., NCT 127’s recent concert in Jakarta). The Hillsborough disaster in 1989 occurred at a football stadium. But the tragedy in Itaewon was not an organized event at a venue that can control entrants. Itaewon is a neighborhood. It would’ve been challenging to cordon off access to the area completely. As such, it would’ve been almost impossible to assess numbers in the neighborhood. But that doesn’t mean nothing could’ve been done.
Reports state that there was no discernible crowd control in Itaewon on this night. In the past, police officers apparently blocked off and controlled access to several smaller alleyways. They had an organized plan to deal with the anticipated influx of people. Several witnesses have noted a complete lack of crowd control this year.
It appears that far fewer than 200 officers were deployed that night. It’s unclear if the 137 police officers deployed were more or less than in the past. Only 58 uniformed police officers were in the area. The remaining plain-clothes officers were looking for petty crimes and drug offenses. I haven’t found any reports of such arrests made that night.
There are other major criticisms of how authorities handled Halloween. The city deployed 6,500 officers to a candlelight protest in Gwanghwamun that day. Approximately 25,000 people attended that rally. That’s one-quarter the number of people in Itaewon but 47x as many police officers.
“We understand that it was not a problem that could have been solved by deploying police or firefighters in advance” ~ Lee Sang-min, Minister of the Interior and Safety
Authorities are claiming there was no way this event could’ve been predicted. That appears to be an outright lie. It is no secret that Itaewon gets very busy on the weekend closest to Halloween. Despite social distancing measures, Itaewon has been busy on Halloween for the past two years. Some reports suggest the crowd was much bigger in 2017.
There was apparently a fair amount of buzz on social media about plans to head to Itaewon for Halloween. Seoul City Hall’s real-time crowd monitoring system draws data from cell phone locations. This system can predict crowd sizes up to 12 hours in advance. Authorities didn’t use it. They didn’t close the subway station, a tactic often used when crowd numbers surge in certain areas. Despite deploying this tactic in the past, they didn’t use it this year.
Was there an overreaction to the Itaewon tragedy?
Many organizations, venues, and English academies canceled Halloween-themed events the next day. I saw comments online that this was an overreaction, attempting to vilify Halloween. This may have been a knee-jerk reaction. It may have been based on xenophobic reporting surrounding Halloween celebrations last year.
I saw those decisions as more of a sign of respect. Following one of the largest tragedies in recent Korean history, any celebration seemed callous. Authorities declared a 1-week national period of mourning. Emotions were raw. Many other events were canceled or postponed out of respect. My son’s university postponed its festival by a week so as not to occur during the national week of mourning.
Several weeks have passed since this horrific incident. I’ve yet to see any stories or comments on the backlash against the “foreign” celebration of Halloween or expats. Most outrage has focused on determining why the government/police weren’t better prepared.
What do I hope will happen as a result of the Itaewon tragedy?
It’s natural for the victims’ families, witnesses, and the public to want someone to blame. Assigning blame is human nature—it gives us a place to direct our anger.
Could the police have had a more significant presence? Definitely. Should the police have better estimated the number of people who’d show up? It would appear so. Should there have been a more organized effort to enforce crowd control? Absolutely. Could this tragedy have been avoided? I believe so.
Who’s to blame for the Itaewon tragedy?
So, who should get the blame? Should it be the head of the Yongsan police department? Yongsan has jurisdiction over Itaewon. Should it be Lee Sang-min, Minister of the Interior and Safety? Perhaps the Seoul City government? I don’t know. I don’t know which individuals or groups made the decisions that resulted in this horrible tragedy. But the government’s claims that this couldn’t have been predicted or prevented don’t hold water.
More police should’ve been on hand. They should’ve cordoned off streets and alleyways. They should have closed the subway station. There should’ve been a much more coordinated plan for crowd control. Someone made the decision not to do those things. We should hold that person (or persons) accountable.
While assigning blame may help us deal with tragedies, it doesn’t do anything to bring the victims back. Nor does it do anything to prevent the same thing from happening in the future. We have to look at the tragedy and learn from the mistakes. We must enact changes that will reduce the chances of this happening again.
Furthermore, the drive to assign blame doesn’t always help understand the truth. On Friday, November 11, a Yongsan police station officer was found dead from an apparent suicide. He was under investigation for deleting an internal report warning of public safety dangers during Halloween. Some reports indicate he was ordered to delete the report in question and that he didn’t act of his own volition. Without the ability to defend himself, we may never know if he was guilty or if he was being made the scapegoat.
We can take more responsibility for our own safety
I’m going to state my next point very carefully. I am in no way blaming any of the victims for what happened. Nor am I blaming anyone for going to Itaewon on that night. I have no doubt that things escalated quickly. No one in that moving crowd could’ve done anything to avoid the tragedy that occurred.
But I have seen comments by friends and other expats online about Halloween in Itaewon. Upon arriving in Itaewon, they sensed it was dangerous, overcrowded, and unsafe. They left immediately. If my son had informed me he’d been planning to go to Itaewon, I would’ve insisted that he not go. I’ve seen the videos of past Halloweens in Itaewon.
If I’d gone to Itaewon that night, after seeing how crowded the subway station was, I would’ve turned around and left. I used to worry when my wife went to the peaceful candlelight protests in 2016. The crowds grew bigger each week. I always worried about her safety in such large crowds. Despite the peaceful protests, I worried about the possibility of something going wrong. These things tend to happen in an instant, with little to no warning.
Sadly, the Itaewon tragedy highlights a larger problem—lax safety standards
Visitors to Korea often comment on the generally lackadaisical approach to safety. Let me tread carefully. My home country, Canada, is not without fault. But in general, I would say that Canada takes safety more seriously than Korea. If anything, countries like Canada have swung too far to the side of caution. Schools have banned activities like “tag” from schoolyards for being too dangerous.
But to the Western eye, Koreans generally seem less aware or concerned about potential danger. For example:
- People who take their chances crossing 8-lane roads without crosswalks or lights
- Apartment building painters who sit on a single board. They swing back and forth as they spray paint the side of buildings. There are no discernable safety harnesses or backup ropes.
- Children, free to roam about cars and stick their heads out of sunroofs. This includes cars hurtling down the expressways at 100 km/h.
These are all things I’ve seen on more than one occasion.
A general awareness of how dangerous cars can be seems to be lacking
While editing this post, my wife was watching a show about traffic accidents in Korea. An expert shows clips captured by dashboard cams (known as black boxes in Korea). The panel then attempts to determine whether the driver was at fault.
One example showed someone driving at about 5–10 km/h in an apartment complex. A child bolted from between two parked cars and bounced off the hood of the car. Other examples showed adults bolting across roads from between parked cars. In these instances, the drivers couldn’t have done much (if anything) to avoid the accidents. The pedestrians should’ve been more aware of the dangers of emerging from between parked cars in that fashion.
I remember seeing a reality show about Bondi Beach a while ago. In one scene, lifeguards had to rescue a male Korean tourist who’d gone too far from shore and was in danger of drowning. The lifeguards were quite upset that this person who couldn’t swim hadn’t been more careful.
The lifeguards tried to impress upon him and his female companion how close he’d come to dying. They both nervously laughed it off. This only infuriated the lifeguards further, who’d put their own lives at risk to save his. They commented that this was a common occurrence with Asian tourists. Many of them couldn’t swim yet failed to recognize the danger they’d put themselves in.
A lack of situational awareness may be partially responsible for the Itaewon tragedy
I’ve also read that people maybe didn’t realize the potential dangers in Itaewon because Seoulites are used to crowds. Anyone who takes the subway during rush hour knows the issues with overcrowding. This is unsurprising, with Seoul having the 6th highest global population density. Despite being a common phenomenon, that doesn’t mean people can’t be aware of potential dangers.
The government and the police have a responsibility to protect society. But we can increase our safety by taking a more active role in keeping ourselves safe.
Let’s never forget the Itaewon tragedy, but let’s learn from it so nothing like this ever happens again
Instead of pointing fingers and banning Halloween, I’d rather this become a painful learning experience. This event was no doubt a horrific tragedy. It was an unfortunate occurrence that most likely could’ve been prevented. Considering the number of people and the narrow alleys, it’s amazing there was only one horrific event that night.
As a society, we tend to have short memories. Koreans remember the Sampoong Department store collapse. They can’t forget the Seongsu Bridge collapse. After those incidents, there was a renewed focus on construction safety in Korea. But there have been at least two construction site accidents involving structure collapses in Gwangju in recent years. In early November, a KORAIL railway worker was killed. KORAIL faces investigations for violating January’s new workplace safety law.
The incident in Itaewon was a horrific tragedy. I can’t imagine what the families and friends of the victims are going through. I’m not sure if we can blame any one person. But surely, some people should be held accountable. I hope that, as a country, Korea doesn’t only look to assign blame but rather seeks to learn from this horrific event.
Awareness and education are key to preventing another Itaewon tragedy
We should expect the government and the police to do everything they can to protect us. But we can be more responsible for our own safety. We can better assess our environment more critically. I doubt anyone has gotten a ticket in Korea for driving at 100 km/h in heavy rain. But common sense suggests that drivers should reduce their speed in such conditions. Perhaps one of the best ways to honor the victims of this tragedy is to place a greater focus on safety. That includes both from an administrative and individual perspective.
We can do a better job of educating children about safety. We can emphasize focusing on safety as a society. Let’s hold accountable those responsible for creating the unsafe conditions that led to this tragedy. But let’s also take it upon ourselves to take charge of our own safety. Let’s do everything we can to ensure we never have to witness another tragedy like this again.
Subscribe to this blog or follow me on Instagram, Threads, Facebook, LinkedIn, or Twitter for more content and updates.